AIO score
Strong73 / 100
AI visibility report
relay.app · Last audited May 3, 2026
AIO score
Strong73 / 100
Ghost Test
Gaps found1 / 4
key questions AI crawlers couldn't answer
Summary
relay.app is in good shape for AI crawlers (AIO 73/100). The most room to improve is Renderability & JS (6/20). AI crawlers could not find a description of what the company does without running JavaScript, so AI assistants may guess or leave it out.
We ask an AI model each question twice: once using only the HTML a crawler like GPTBot receives, and once using the page as visitors see it after JavaScript runs. A question is flagged when only the visitor version can answer it.
Page: https://www.relay.app/pricing
Both versions could answer: AI crawlers get the same information visitors do.
01 Pricing for Relay.app is as follows: 02 03 - **Free Plan**: $0 per month 04 - 1 user 05 - 500 free AI credits/month 06 - Multi-step workflows (200 steps/month) 07 08 - **Professional Plan**: $19 per month (billed annually) 09 - 1 user 10 - 2,000 free AI credits/month 11 12 - **Team Plan**: $59 per month (billed annually) 13 - 10 users included 14 - 2,000 free AI credits/month 15 - Shared workflows and connections 16 17 - **Enterprise Plan**: Custom pricing 18 - Contact for details on custom usage limits, integrations, and priority support.
01 Pricing: 02 - Free: $0/month, 1 user, 500 free AI credits/mo, 200 steps/month 03 - Professional: $19/month (billed annually), 1 user, 2,000 free AI credits/mo, 750 steps/month 04 - Team: $59/month (billed annually), 10 users included, 2,000 free AI credits/mo, 1,500 steps/month 05 - Enterprise: Custom pricing, contact for details, custom usage limits, custom integrations, priority support 06 07 AI credit bundles: 08 - 5,000 AI credits: $11/month (annual), $15/month (monthly) 09 - 10,000 AI credits: $23/month (annual), $30/month (monthly) 10 - 15,000 AI credits: $34/month (annual), $45/month (monthly) 11 - 20,000 AI credits: $45/month (annual), $60/month (monthly) 12 - 25,000 AI credits: $56/month (annual), $75/month (monthly) 13 - 35,000 AI credits: $79/month (annual), $105/month (monthly) 14 - 40,000 AI credits: $90/month (annual), $120/month (monthly) 15 - 50,000 AI credits: $113/month (annual), $150/month (monthly) 16 - 75,000 AI credits: $169/month (annual), $225/month (monthly) 17 - 100,000 AI credits: $225/month (annual), $300/month (monthly) 18 - 150,000 AI credits: $338/month (annual), $450/month (monthly)
Page: https://relay.app/product
Both versions could answer: AI crawlers get the same information visitors do.
01 The main features of Relay.app include: 02 03 1. **Triggers**: Various types of triggers to start workflows, including app-based triggers, time-based triggers, manual triggers, form triggers, webhooks, table triggers, mailhooks, and batch triggers. 04 05 2. **App Steps**: Connect apps to perform actions using real objects like Deals, Contacts, Tickets, and Invoices, with strong typing and automatic relationship following. 06 07 3. **AI Steps**: Integrate AI for tasks like extraction, classification, and analysis, with built-in AI steps and customizable prompts. 08 09 4. **Human in the Loop Steps**: Add checkpoints for approvals or human input, including built-in AI reviews and approval steps. 10 11 5. **Webhooks & HTTP Steps**: Communicate with external tools using webhooks and custom HTTP requests, including wait-for-webhook functionality. 12 13 6. **Web Scraping Steps**: Bring live web content into workflows with tools for extracting content, capturing screenshots, and crawling links. 14 15 7. **Utilities**: Additional tools for data transformations, PDF creation and manipulation, running custom code, and file conversions.
01 The main features of Relay.app include: 02 03 1. **Workflow Automation**: Describe workflows in plain language, with visual inspection and manual editing options. 04 2. **AI Integration**: Leverage AI for tasks like extraction, summarization, and content creation, with built-in AI actions and model selection. 05 3. **Human-in-the-Loop**: Enable human review checkpoints for critical tasks to ensure control over automation. 06 4. **Core Frameworks**: Built on workflows, sequences, tables, and MCP servers for structured automation. 07 5. **Visual Editor**: User-friendly visual editor for non-technical teams, with advanced editing capabilities. 08 6. **Dynamic Waits**: Pause workflows for specific durations or until conditions are met. 09 7. **Triggers**: Various triggers to start workflows, including app-based, time-based, manual, and form triggers. 10 8. **App Steps**: Connect and automate tasks across different applications using app actions. 11 9. **Webhooks & HTTP Steps**: Integrate with external APIs and manage data flow seamlessly. 12 10. **Utilities**: Tools for data transformation, file manipulation, and running custom code. 13 11. **Portable Rich Text**: Generate and use rich text outputs across different platforms. 14 12. **Templates**: Create shareable workflow templates for standardization across teams.
Page: https://relay.app/integrations
Only the visitor version could answer: AI crawlers miss this information.
01 not found
01 1Password 02 ActiveCampaign 03 Airtable 04 Anthropic 05 Apify 06 Apollo 07 App Store 08 Asana 09 Ashby 10 AssemblyAI 11 Attio 12 Axiom.ai 13 beehiiv 14 bitly 15 Bloobirds 16 Bluesky 17 Box 18 Brevo
Page: https://relay.app/security
Both versions could answer: AI crawlers get the same information visitors do.
01 Relay.app has successfully completed the System and Organization Controls (SOC) 2 Type II examination, which is a standard for data security among digital companies in the U.S. The SOC 2 examination assesses the design and operating effectiveness of controls, examines the security of vendors and third parties, and defines policies to ensure continued protection for customers and employees. The report is available by request.
01 Relay.app is SOC 2 compliant. The report is available by request to [email protected]. The SOC 2 examination assesses the design and operating effectiveness of controls, examines the security of vendors and third parties, and defines policies to ensure continued protection for customers and employees.
Each sampled page, scored on what an AI crawler receives before any JavaScript runs.
homepage · 0% of visible text in server HTML
pricing · 0% of visible text in server HTML
pricing · 0% of visible text in server HTML
docs · 0% of visible text in server HTML
docs · 0% of visible text in server HTML
integrations · 0% of visible text in server HTML
integrations · 0% of visible text in server HTML
product · 0% of visible text in server HTML
product · 0% of visible text in server HTML
security · 0% of visible text in server HTML
security · 0% of visible text in server HTML
blog · 0% of visible text in server HTML
No crawl warnings: every sampled page loaded.
This report shows what AI crawlers read. It doesn’t test whether ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity get past the site’s firewall when a person asks them about a page. If this is your company, the Threshold Test checks each assistant against your key pages and tells you what to change. It’s free once you’ve claimed this profile.
The Ghost Test checks whether an AI crawler can answer the questions buyers ask, such as pricing and main features. We ask an AI model each question twice about the page most likely to answer it: once using only the HTML the server sends (what crawlers like GPTBot read, since they don't run JavaScript), and once using the page as visitors see it. A question is flagged as a gap when only the visitor version can answer it.
No. A gap means the information exists on the site but AI crawlers can't read it without running JavaScript. That raises the risk that an AI assistant guesses or leaves the fact out, but it is not a record of a specific wrong answer.
The AIO score adds up four pillars: technical & crawlability (25 points), renderability (20), structure (30) and metadata (25). Each is scored on the HTML AI crawlers receive. The methodology page lists every check.
Coverage describes how many of the site's important pages the audit managed to sample; certainty describes how consistent the evidence was. Lower values mean the report is directional and worth re-running.