AIO score
Needs work58
out of 100
Want the full breakdown?
Request the complete report for this company, or ask us to grade a different site.
- Updated scoring — refreshed pillar breakdown when you audit again or expand coverage.
- Full hallucination map — every sampled question, not just one example.
- Prioritized fix list — clear next steps tied to what we observed.
- Competitor lens — discovered peers and how you stack up (where data is available).
Public preview — AIO plus hallucination evidence, with one sample Q&A. Blurred sections unlock in the full report.
Key KPIs
Hallucinations detected
Detected3 / 4
One or more questions flagged
Hallucination evidence (Ghost Q&A)
Reference: https://filipkonecny.com/2026/03/26/dub-plans/
Page: https://filipkonecny.com/2026/03/26/dub-plans/
What is the pricing?
FlaggedRed = the reading that misleads or underplays the answer in this sample. Green = where we surfaced the mismatch (for example, what visitors see on screen versus what the first automated pass captured).
Behind-the-scenes snapshot
01 not found
What visitors see on the page
01 Dub plans at a glance:
02
03 - **Free**: $0
04 - Best fit: Testing the platform or running light campaigns
05 - What stands out: 1,000 tracked events per month, 25 new links, 3 custom domains, 30-day analytics retention
06
07 - **Pro**: $25/month
08 - Best fit: Creators, consultants, and small teams that need room to grow
09 - What stands out: 50,000 tracked events per month, 1,000 new links, 1-year retention
10
11 - **Business**: $75/month
12 - Best fit: Growing teams running campaigns, attribution, or affiliate programs
13 - What stands out: Conversion tracking, A/B testing, customer insights, event webhooks, Dub Partners
14
15 - **Advanced**: $250/month
16 - Best fit: High-volume teams that need bigger limits without going custom
17 - What stands out: 1,000,000 tracked events per month and 5-year retention
18
+ 3 additional samples are hidden in the full report.
Locked full-report insights
Executive summary
- AIO readiness is needs work (58/100), indicating inconsistent visibility that can improve with targeted fixes.
- Hallucinations detected: 3 / 4, meaning one or more sampled answers didn’t line up across the different ways automation reads your pages, which can make AI answers drift.
- Coverage scope is complete with high confidence, so this audit should be treated as decision-ready.
Category breakdown
- Technical & crawlability5
- Renderability & JS6
- Structure & readability27
- Metadata & consistency20
Coverage: complete · Certainty: high
- Improve robots.txt / llms.txt / sitemap discoverability for AI crawlers
- Reduce JS-only content for core pages (AI crawlers may not render JS)
- worldathletics.org
- flashscoreusa.com
- sofascore.com
- linkedin.com
2 prioritized fixes + full competitive lens
Deep diagnostics are intentionally blurred in public preview. Unlock everything in the free full report.
Unlock full reportReport FAQ
How is the AIO score calculated?
The AIO score combines four pillar scores—how discoverable the site is, how reliably content shows up for automation, how clear the layout and wording are, and how well titles and previews match the page. The total is shown as a single 0–100 number so you can compare runs over time.
What does confidence mean?
Confidence reflects how complete and consistent the evidence was in this audit. Higher confidence means we had enough stable signal to treat the results as a stronger guide; lower confidence means you should treat it as directional and validate anything critical.
Why can hallucinations be detected with a decent structural score?
Structure is about organization and readability. Hallucination flags compare whether answers match across different ways automation reads the same page. A site can look well organized yet still show different facts in different readings, which is how inconsistent AI answers slip through.